Hi and low context communication styles

It is the receiver of the message who assumes responsibility for inferring the hidden or contextual meanings of the message. Language and Culture According to the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, the language we speak, especially the structure of that language, determines how we perceive and experience the world around us.

The Geography of Thought The cognitive approach views culture as a complex knowledge system. Elaborated codes, on the other hand, involve the use of verbal amplifications, or rich and expressive language, in transmitting meaning, placing relatively little reliance on nonverbal and other contextual cues.

These stylistic differences can become, in turn, a major source of misunderstanding, distrust, and conflict in intercultural communication. They also tend to avoid conflict, seek consensus, and take fewer risks. On a conceptual level, collectivistic and individualistic values shape the norms and rules that guide behavior in these cultures.

High-Context and Low-Context Communication Cultures A communication style is the way people communicate with others verbally and nonverbally. Direct and Indirect Communication Styles A case in point, to illustrate the difference between high-context and low-context communication cultures, is the difference between direct and indirect communication styles.

Therefore, cultural misunderstanding due to differences in communication styles can be reduced by creating a context of equality, where one group does not dominate the other. To facilitate intergroup dialogues between two cultural groups, it is of vital importance to help both groups understand such stylistic differences as well as the underlying values and histories that shape them.

Later, Hofstede and Bond added a fifth dimension, dynamic Confucianism, with long-term orientation refers to future-oriented values such as persistence and thrift, whereas short-term orientation refers to past- and present-oriented values, such as respect for tradition and fulfilling social obligations.

The French language has numerous forms of variations in verbs for different subjects, tenses, and modes, whereas there is no variation for verbs in the Chinese language.

The use of animation and exaggeration by African Americans, and the readiness to initiate conversations, may be perceived by Korean Americans as threatening and insincere, whereas for African Americans, the verbal restraints and lack of nonverbal immediacy on the part of Korean Americans may communicate a condescending and prejudicial attitude.

Being aware that there are differences will help you do business. For instance, a PTA is usually a low context situation: Low Context Rule oriented, people play by external rules More knowledge is codified, public, external, and accessible. People from high context cultures may find this focus a little insulting, as it may be interpreted as the other party not having much faith in the integrity of the partner.

Learning occurs by following explicit directions and explanations of others. They rely heavily on the hidden, implicit cues of the social context, such as interpersonal relationships, the physical and psychological environments, and other contextual cues.

Needless to say, understanding the fundamental patterns of communication styles as well as the underlying systems of thought that give rise to them will help to reduce cultural barriers that hinder intercultural relationships and collaborations.

In these societies, cultural behavior and beliefs may need to be spelled out explicitly so that those coming into the cultural environment know how to behave.

Verbal messages are also important, but the emphasis is not placed on the technique of constructing and delivering clear verbal messages for maximum persuasiveness. It is not surprising that, except for a couple of exceptions, such as France, most high power distance societies are also collectivistic societies.

They found that a Japanese participants made more statements about contextual information and relationships than Americans did, and b Japanese participants recognized previously seen objects more accurately when they saw them in their original settings rather than in the novel settings, whereas this manipulation had relatively little effect on Americans.

As it is a vast topic, this seminar paper will focus on the differences in high-context and low-context communication styles across cultures and their influence on the way people perceive information.

They emphasize the obligations they have toward their ingroup members, and are willing to sacrifice their individual needs and desires for the benefits of the group. Dugri represents a cultural identity for Israeli Jews that developed over time in reaction to historical oppression and the Diaspora experience of Jews.

Members of low-context communication cultures expect the message sender to be direct, provide detailed information, and use unambiguous language because they do not assume pre-existing knowledge of the people or the setting.

People from high uncertainty avoidance cultures, such as many Latin American cultures, Mediterranean cultures, and some European e.

People from high uncertainty avoidance cultures, such as many Latin American cultures, Mediterranean cultures, and some European e.

Holistic thinkers tend to perceive events holistically or within a large context. Typically a high-context culture will be relational, collectivistintuitive, and contemplative. In general, cultures that favor low-context communication will pay more attention to the literal meanings of words than to the context surrounding them.

Analytical thinkers attend more to focal objects and specific details; what is going on in the environment is less important.Communication style in a high vs. low context culture In HC cultures, communication style is infl uenced by the closeness of human re- lationships, well-structured social hierarchy, and strong behavioural norms (Kim.

Language and communication, especially high- versus low-context communication styles, have been shown to lead to differences in Web sites.

Low-context communication provides the lowest common denominator for intercultural communication through the Internet by making messages linear, articulated, explicit, and therefore easier to understand in the absence of contextual clues.

High-Context Vs. Low-Context Communication Styles

Communication style in a high vs. low context culture In HC cultures, communication style is infl uenced by the closeness of human re- lationships, well-structured social hierarchy, and strong behavioural norms (Kim.

The terms high context communication and low context communication are used to explain a difference in the use and the meaning of words.

High context communication means that much remains unsaid in a conversation.

High-context and low-context cultures

High-Context vs. Low-Context Communication Styles High-Context vs. Low-Context Communication Styles Introduction Communication is a process of. Intercultural Communication: High- and Low-Context Cultures.

posted August 17th, by Brian Neese. Anthropologist Edward Hall founded the field of intercultural communication in with his book The Silent agronumericus.com book was originally intended for the general public, but it sparked academic research in intercultural communication and fueled interest in subjects like nonverbal.

Hi and low context communication styles
Rated 3/5 based on 42 review